Special Collections Research Center
Page featured image content
Page main body content
Located on the 6th floor of Bird Library, the Special Collections Research Center (SCRC) advances scholarship and learning by collecting, preserving and providing access to rare books, manuscripts and other primary source materials. SCRC's collections span time and format, from cuneiform tablets to born digital media, and document the history of Syracuse University and our global society through printed materials, photographs, artworks, audio and moving image recordings, University records, and more. Collection areas include activism and social reform, architecture and design, popular culture, photography, and the history of recorded sound. Access is free and provided by appointment only in our Reading Room. We recommend making your appointment two weeks in advance to ensure that collections are available and four week for audiovisual materials to allow time for conservation and digitization if necessary.
SCRC was formerly known as the George Arents Research Library and was started as part of the University’s fledgling library in 1870. The first major acquisition of the special collections in 1997 was made possible by a generous donation with the purchase of the library of Leopold von Ranke, the founder of modern historical research technique. Since then, SCRC has continued to expand its collections to represent a plethora of topics and research interests. In 2016, University Archives and the Belfer Audio Archive and Preservation Laboratory merged with SCRC, creating a unified repository and research center for all library collections.
SCRC aspires to be a vibrant research and learning environment for Syracuse University students, faculty, and the wider scholarly community. We provide access to our world-renowned rare and archival collections and expert guidance in their use in order to facilitate personal discovery and the creation of new knowledge.
SCRC collects, preserves, and provides access to materials that document the history of Syracuse University and our global society, including rare printed materials, original manuscripts, photographs, artworks, audio and moving image recordings, University records, and more. SCRC staff is dedicated to encouraging and facilitating the use of the collections by:
- Engaging students, faculty, and the wider scholarly community with our collections through public programs, exhibitions, digital initiatives, and publications
- Supporting innovative undergraduate and graduate learning by fostering new ideas about the role of special collections in the University's curriculum
- Prolonging the life of the University's rare and archival holdings for generations of students and scholars by implementing ongoing preservation measures
- Providing a variety of ways for the University and wider scholarly community to access and explore these collections
The Special Collections Research Center (SCRC) at Syracuse University Libraries provides access to materials that document the history of Syracuse University and our global society, including rare printed materials, original manuscripts, photographs, audio and moving image recordings, University records, and more. The collections contain some content that may be harmful or difficult to view. These materials are preserved for their historic and research value.
Collection materials may be harmful because:
● they may contain language and images that are racist, homophobic, sexist, ableist, or otherwise derogatory and insensitive;
● they demonstrate bias and exclusion in institutional collecting;
● they reflect and reinforce societal power structures.
Archivists, curators, and librarians choose what language to use when describing materials. Finding aids may therefore contain harmful language because:
● some descriptions were written many years ago, using language that was accepted at the time;
● archivists often use standardized search terms, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, some of which may be outdated or insensitive;
● archivists also often re-use language provided by creators or former owners of the archival materials in order to provide context but which also reflect biases and prejudices.
While the SCRC holds these materials as part of the historic record, staff are also actively seeking to balance the preservation of this history with sensitivity to how these materials are described for researchers. SCRC staff are committed to a reparative archival framework to do justice to those whose humanity has been harmed, silenced, ignored, or disenfranchised within the historical record. This ongoing work includes identifying harmful items within the collections we hold, assessing and updating descriptions that are harmful, and establishing standards and policies to prevent future harmful language in staff-generated descriptions. We are working to do the following:
● inform users about the presence and origin of harmful content when we find or are made aware of such materials;
● revise descriptions and standardized descriptive terms, supplement description with more respectful terms, or use preferred names for people represented in our collections;
● research the problem, listen to users and communities, and share our findings with each other and colleagues across the archival field;
● evaluate existing processes for exclusionary practices or institutional bias that prioritize one culture and/or group over another;
● make a commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.
Due to the large volume of collection materials in SCRC, the reparative work of our staff is ongoing, and we often need to rely on our patrons and researchers to assist with these efforts. You can help us in our reparative work by reporting potentially harmful language in our finding aids or potentially harmful collection material not already identified in our finding aids. Please email us at firstname.lastname@example.org or speak to our Reading Room staff. SCRC will determine whether or not we will change or remove terms from archival descriptions. We will weigh potential harm against considerations such as input from affected communities, accurate preservation of the historical record, professional best practices, and allocation of staff resources.